SaMoLo in Retrospectives


SaMoLo, or the Same as, More of, Less of technique, is a fine tuning facilitation exercise with roots in early XP.

‘Same As’ are those traits that you value and don’t want to lose. Many traditional feedback methods end up glossing over these items and as a result the behaviors that should be reinforced, aren’t.

‘More Of’ are those traits that you want to encourage. It may be a newly acquired skill or the beginning of a behavior. Or it may be an area where something is lacking and you want to help ther person find a way of bridging the gap.

‘Less Of’ are those traits that have simply gone too far. They may be great traits, but eventually someone will ‘out Herods, Herod’ and things need to return to normal. – fairlygoodpractices.com

Thanks in part to Jeff Nielsen, I’ve discovered that SaMoLo can also be the sweet spot for easing new teams into iteration retrospectives.

  1. It is easy to remember
  2. More engaging than What worked? What didn’t?
  3. Takes 30 to 40 minutes
  4. Pairs well with other exercises

In a recent iteration retrospective I paired the SaMoLo technique with a basic time line exercise. Our team, which is somewhat new to Agile, had recorded when we opened and closed each User Story throughout the iteration. I decided to jog the team’s memory by taping the index cards up on a whiteboard in a time line format. (You’d be surprised how quickly we forget all that we’d accomplished over the last two weeks)

Scrumology SaMoLo

Once we spent the first few minutes reaching a consensus on our iteration time line, I moved onto the SaMoLo portion of the retrospective.

A tip for facilitators trying this technique, remember to set the expectation early on that each team member should contribute at least one Same as to the discussion. Also, I recommend that you exercise restraint and do not quickly write the team statements onto the whiteboard. Encourage conversations around each statement before writing, as that’s where most of the magic occurs in this exercise. The resulting dialogue is generally much more important than the statement itself.

After going around the room a few times with Same as, I moved onto the More of and Less of pieces of the discussion.

Another tip, feel free to combine both of these as it’ll save time. I’ve noticed that one team member’s More of can easily be illustrated as Less of the opposite at times, and depending on your team these may come out in different ways. As you can see in the picture above, we had only one Less of in this last iteration retrospective.

When I wrapped up the SaMoLo retrospective, I noticed something peculiar. I found that it was redundant to list out Action Items or Take Aways with owners. As strange as this may sound, the team found that merely documenting the Same as, More of and Less of items were enough for fine tuning their habits. Your mileage may vary on this part, and I’ll keep a running tab of things to ensure we aren’t rehashing the same issues in the next iteration.

In conclusion, I’ve found that SaMoLo is working rather well so far with our new Agile team. It fosters more conversation than What worked, What didn’t and illustrates things that we should keep doing well. It is fairly straightforward. It is not too vanilla, and on the other hand it is not too abstract or hard to grasp.

If you have SaMoLo retrospective stories please share them below!

[Update]

I am humbled by the responses from Esther Derby & Diana Larsen on this approach below. Diana has been kind enough to add this as an online addendum to the exercises listed in Agile Retrospectives: Making Good Teams Great.

Since I’ve published this post, we’ve tried this technique in another iteration retrospective with success. I’m now reviewing SaMoLo notes from previous retrospectives as I facilitate. For example, before going around the room with Same as I review the Same as notes from the previous retrospective to help remind the team of what we said.

I’m looking forward to fine tuning the approach in the future!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • HackerNews
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit

, , ,

  1. #1 by ojuncu on May 12, 2010 - 2:31 am

    Nice put. I would give a try to combine it in an “Appreciative Introspective” exercise.

  2. #2 by Esther Derby on May 12, 2010 - 4:24 pm

    Nice. I like the nuance of noticing actions that might otherwise be overlooked and encouraging/appreciating them.

    As you point out, it's important to pair this activity with one that looks at what happened during the iteration.

    Without a shared picture of the events and data, people are talking only from their own experience. I can imagine a someone experiencing an action as positive (or negative), not realizing that the action had an opposite effect on others in the team. Time line is one good way to gather data for shared understanding, but there are many others.

    I also like emphasizing discussion. Just making a list and dot voting isn't enough to build understanding, let alone engagement or buy in.

    I do have a little worry that the title might of your post might lead some people to believe that SaMoLo IS the retrospective.

    I keep running across people who believe that Start/Stop/Keep or What did we do well/What should we do differently is all there is to a retrospective. They almost always think retrospectives are not valuable….I wonder why ;-) ?

  3. #3 by David J Bland on May 12, 2010 - 4:59 pm

    Please let me know how it turns out!

  4. #4 by Diana Larsen on May 12, 2010 - 6:13 pm

    I like it. :)

    +1 on what Esther said about preceeding this with an initial data gathering about the iteration/spring. Very important to have that shared basis for interpretation.

    SaMoLo is one of a family of activities that work in much the same way:
    StopStartKeep (aka StoStaKee & Start/Stop/Continue)
    Prouds/Sorries
    Keep/Drop/Add
    Continue/Cease/Create
    Worked Well/Do Differently
    Plus/Delta

    In spite of the fact that they are similar group interaction processes, each wording has a slightly different impact on the team and stimulates different thinking. Retrospective leaders can use them to switch things up and add variety to their sessions, as you did in yours.

  5. #5 by Esther Derby on May 12, 2010 - 8:24 pm

    Nice. I like the nuance of noticing actions that might otherwise be overlooked and encouraging/appreciating them.

    As you point out, it's important to pair this activity with one that looks at what happened during the iteration.

    Without a shared picture of the events and data, people are talking only from their own experience. I can imagine a someone experiencing an action as positive (or negative), not realizing that the action had an opposite effect on others in the team. Time line is one good way to gather data for shared understanding, but there are many others.

    I also like emphasizing discussion. Just making a list and dot voting isn't enough to build understanding, let alone engagement or buy in.

    I do have a little worry that the title might of your post might lead some people to believe that SaMoLo IS the retrospective.

    I keep running across people who believe that Start/Stop/Keep or What did we do well/What should we do differently is all there is to a retrospective. They almost always think retrospectives are not valuable….I wonder why ;-) ?

  6. #6 by David J Bland on May 12, 2010 - 8:59 pm

    Please let me know how it turns out!

  7. #7 by Diana Larsen on May 12, 2010 - 10:13 pm

    I like it. :)

    +1 on what Esther said about preceeding this with an initial data gathering about the iteration/spring. Very important to have that shared basis for interpretation.

    SaMoLo is one of a family of activities that work in much the same way:
    StopStartKeep (aka StoStaKee & Start/Stop/Continue)
    Prouds/Sorries
    Keep/Drop/Add
    Continue/Cease/Create
    Worked Well/Do Differently
    Plus/Delta

    In spite of the fact that they are similar group interaction processes, each wording has a slightly different impact on the team and stimulates different thinking. Retrospective leaders can use them to switch things up and add variety to their sessions, as you did in yours.

(will not be published)