Everyone Has a Voice in Retrospectives


It can be difficult to get team members to be vocal in retrospectives. I’m always wary of the stronger personalities controlling the conversation, and I’ve found that going around the room calling people out by name can have mixed results. After reading a recent article on effective retrospective formats, I decided to write my experience with finding every voice.

Step 1 – Red & Green. Distribute 2 colors of post-its and a sharpie to each team member. Explain how we are going to use the next 10min to write independently. I recommend starting simple with red & green, and also having a legend on the whiteboard to help people remember which is which. You’d be surprised how quickly they forget! Use the green post-its to write down what helped the team during the iteration, and the red post-its for what hindered them.
scrumology retrospective
Step 2 – Every Voice. Go around the room and allocate 3-5min for each team member to stand up and discuss their post-its. Have the team members listen while the post-its are stuck up on the whiteboard 1-by-1. It’ll look a bit unorganized at first, but after the 2nd or 3rd person you should begin to recognize common threads throughout the conversations.
scrumology retrospective
Step 3 – Group Organization. Have the entire team come up to the board and categorize the post-its into themes. This is important because it is a group exercise, rather than having the facilitator do it by himself.
scrumology retrospective
After the team comes to a general consensus, have them sit down and talk about the groupings. It should be easy to visually recognize the trouble areas, as they are most likely in red post-it clusters. I recommend starting the conversation with those and ending with the green collections. Be certain to call out action items as needed throughout the discussion.

Feel free to customize this format as you see fit. You can spice it up with an egg timer to denote the end of the writing exercise, or add new colors for ideas that do not fall into the helped or hindered buckets. Be aware that the less vocal team members may write very little at first.

In the end, it isn’t important that you stick to a script, but instead ensure that each and every voice is heard.

, , , ,

  1. #1 by andrewonagile on March 2, 2010 - 2:50 pm

    Thanks for the pingback. Your post is certainly prettier than mine.

    In my exoerience the less vocal team members start to write more and more very quickly. While others are talking people are reminded of issues during the sprint and you'll see everyone scribbling out more post-its.

    The most significant part of the exersice is of course to act on the negatives in a structured way. Once they realise they have an influence team members very quickly engage.

  2. #2 by andrewonagile on March 2, 2010 - 2:58 pm

    sorry .. experience and exercise.

  3. #3 by David J Bland on March 2, 2010 - 3:04 pm

    Andrew,

    Thanks for the comments.

    Did you find that team members felt restricted by being limited to What worked & what didn't work with 2 colors?

    Did you group them into themes or have the entire team group collaboratively?

    I do not use voting, which I think brings another variable into the equation.

    In short, I think there are enough subtle differences to warrant this conversation, but I really do feel inspired by your writing.

    -David

  4. #4 by Jon Sullivan on March 2, 2010 - 4:52 pm

    This is a great idea, but falls short when working with a distributed team. Does anyone have ideas on how to make distributed retrospectives better?

  5. #5 by David J Bland on March 2, 2010 - 6:06 pm

    For Distributed Retrospectives, I typically had a combination of:
    - Video Conference
    - Online ALM tool (Rally / V1)
    - Screen Sharing (GoToMeeting, Adobe Connect)
    - Projector

    Perhaps I should sum up my findings from being a facilitator on Distributed Retrospectives as well.

  6. #6 by Jon Sullivan on March 3, 2010 - 2:43 pm

    Our Distributed Retrospectives typically include:
    - Skype Conference Call
    - Google Spreadsheet updated real-time (Did Wells / Do Betters)

    We have three teams and we do a combined retrospective. Teams don't currently have their own retro. I would love to find a good videoconference solution for group chats. Does anyone have a good recommendation there?

  7. #7 by Jon Sullivan on March 3, 2010 - 6:43 pm

    Our Distributed Retrospectives typically include:
    - Skype Conference Call
    - Google Spreadsheet updated real-time (Did Wells / Do Betters)

    We have three teams and we do a combined retrospective. Teams don't currently have their own retro. I would love to find a good videoconference solution for group chats. Does anyone have a good recommendation there?

    • #8 by Gerry Kirk on June 9, 2011 - 9:07 pm

      Jon, Skype does video conferencing now, you could try that.

(will not be published)